<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media Marketing: Twitter vs. Facebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brandingbrand.com/blog/social-media-marketing-twitter-vs-facebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brandingbrand.com/blog/social-media-marketing-twitter-vs-facebook/</link>
	<description>I'd Rather Be Branding</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:36:20 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Autumn P.</title>
		<link>http://brandingbrand.com/blog/social-media-marketing-twitter-vs-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-10963</link>
		<dc:creator>Autumn P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 00:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandingbrand.com/blog/?p=1982#comment-10963</guid>
		<description>I think an important difference between Twitter and Facebook is that you can follow anyone you want to on Twitter.  Yes, you can easily fan a Facebook page (once you find it), but you don&#039;t get the same immediate browsing/friending experience as you do with Twitter (think six degrees of separation).  

Because of the limited number of Twitter features, its users have less distractions.  On the other hand, it takes a lot more work keep the user interested in your Tweets. 

I read on another blog that a Twitter page works best when it is used as a tool to direct the user elsewhere.  This makes a lot of sense to me... It doesn&#039;t need to be Twitter vs. Facebook, but rather Twitter can be a great supplement to a FB page or other site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think an important difference between Twitter and Facebook is that you can follow anyone you want to on Twitter.  Yes, you can easily fan a Facebook page (once you find it), but you don&#8217;t get the same immediate browsing/friending experience as you do with Twitter (think six degrees of separation).  </p>
<p>Because of the limited number of Twitter features, its users have less distractions.  On the other hand, it takes a lot more work keep the user interested in your Tweets. </p>
<p>I read on another blog that a Twitter page works best when it is used as a tool to direct the user elsewhere.  This makes a lot of sense to me&#8230; It doesn&#8217;t need to be Twitter vs. Facebook, but rather Twitter can be a great supplement to a FB page or other site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter? Facebook? What&#8217;s the Dif?</title>
		<link>http://brandingbrand.com/blog/social-media-marketing-twitter-vs-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-7987</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter? Facebook? What&#8217;s the Dif?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandingbrand.com/blog/?p=1982#comment-7987</guid>
		<description>[...] (image taken from BRANDing blog) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (image taken from BRANDing blog) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
